TRADUCCION
The police and military could benefit from any legal benefits offered toFARC guerrillas as an incentive for their disarmament, according to President Juan Manuel Santos.
Speaking at a promotion ceremony for officers of the National Police, Santos said that those officers who “for some reason have had problems with justice” could be dealt with under the Legal Framework for Peace. This law was established to support the peace talks with the FARC in Havana, and grants Congress the power to declare certain offenses (excluding genocide and crimes against humanity) as political crimes.
Santos said that he would not permit that “if the enemy is given some legal benefit, that these are not transferred to the Public Force”.
The issue of impunity for guerrilla crimes has proved politically explosive, with cross-party condemnation greeting the president’s comments that “flexibility” be applied to FARC crimes, and that narco-trafficking and benefiting from narco-trafficking be treated as political crimes.
The government is also under pressure to advance the Havana peace talks by creating opportunities for FARC guerrillas to participate in politics in the future, requiring the establishment of some form of amnesty or diminished or suspended sentences.
The president has previously said that members of the armed forces who committed “errors” during the armed conflict could be given shorter sentences or have their crimes absolved if it would contribute to a lasting peace.
|
Former soldiers have argued for security service veterans and personnel to receive the same leniency as that applied to the guerrillas.
Jamie Ruiz, president of Arcore (Association of Retired Officials of the Security Forces) last year said: “It’s a question of symmetry: If soldiers and policemen, through fighting in the same conflict, have fallen foul of the criminal law, it would not be fair… for the terrorists to ask for zero days in prison, and the soldiers to face 50 or 60 years in prison.”
Santos now claims that “the legal framework for peace is the most ideal and most effective way” to address offences by the security services, as it has been approved as being in line with the Constitution and can allow as yet unknown benefits “without incurring impunity”.
Many disagree; Gustavo Gallon of the NGO Colombian Commission of Jurists said “Instead of achieving maximum justice in adverse conditions, it allows you to reduce the duty to administer justice under the pretext of peace”.
The president has argued that it would be impossible to provide legal redress to every offence committed during 50 years of conflict, and wants the military to share the leniency granted through a “flexible” approach. “We have to find a sensible formula to give closure so that there is no doubt as to the future legal certainty of our forces”, he added.
The president then took the opportunity to praise the way in which he claimed the Colombian military had operated according to “a constitutional mandate, in defense of a legal and constitutional order and under orders from civil authorities”. This was in contrast to many countries in the region, and Santos emphasized the “legitimacy with which our armed forces operated, and that can never be forgotten”.
RESUMEN
Santos afirma ahora que "el marco jurídico para la paz es la manera más ideal y más eficaz" para hacer frente a los delitos por los servicios de seguridad, ya que ha sido aprobado como estar en consonancia con la Constitución y puede permitir que hasta ahora desconocidos "beneficios sin incurrir en la impunidad ".
Muchos no están de acuerdo; Gustavo Gallón de la ONG Comisión Colombiana de Juristas, dijo "En lugar de lograr la justicia máximo en condiciones adversas, que le permite reducir el deber de administrar justicia bajo el pretexto de la paz".
MÁS: ONGs critican la ley de justicia transicional en Colombia en la corte constitucional
El presidente ha afirmado que sería imposible para proporcionar reparación legal a todos los delitos cometidos durante los 50 años de conflicto, y quiere a los militares a compartir la indulgencia concedida a través de un enfoque "flexible". "Tenemos que encontrar una fórmula sensata para dar cierre a fin de que no hay ninguna duda en cuanto a la futura seguridad jurídica de nuestras fuerzas", agregó.
El entonces presidente aprovechó la ocasión para elogiar la forma en la que afirmó que el ejército colombiano había operado de acuerdo con "un mandato constitucional, en defensa de un orden legal y constitucional y bajo las órdenes de las autoridades civiles". Esto fue en contraste con muchos países de la región, y Santos destacó la "legitimidad con la que nuestras fuerzas armadas operan, y que nunca se puede olvidar".
0 comentarios: